The Richest Company in America. But Not Rich Enough.

Image result for Apple

The case of Iowa government giving Apple $208 million dollars is a good example of extortion. When the payoff is so minuscule one has to wonder why. Does the governor get a sticker?

Here are some facts to consider:

$208 million given to Apple will “create” 50 jobs at over $4 million apiece.

The claimed “up to” $100 million Apple will invest in local infrastructure in return uses the same misleading terminology as the Volkswagen diesel scandal’s “up to” 40 times of emissions standards. “Up to” in Apple’s case would only happen if unrequired expansions occur. Like VW’s emissions, neither is certain.

Governor Kim Reynolds claimed that tax credits are not the same thing as subsidies. Check the balance sheet and get back to me.

Apple just gave rabid hate group, the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) a million dollars. Whether SPLC is right or wrong in their activities is not as important an issue as the fact that Iowa government has no place funneling taxpayer funds through Apple toward any advocacy group. I just happen to hate SPLC myself.

Donald Trump endorsed such economic development extortion in December saying … “they can negotiate good deals with the different states and all of that.”

Economist Richard Florida, in a 2012 study found… “virtually no association between economic development incentives and any measure of economic performance.”

Another study found even slower growth associated with these handouts because management ignored real business efficiencies as they focused the extortion of taxpayer money.

Iowa State economist, David Swenson says of the Microsoft and Google data centers already in Iowa, “They’re just big, sterile, hot boxes that don’t feed into Iowa’s economy.” In fact, employment there has shrunk as computer babysitters are replaced by automation.

Doesn’t this, and other economic development scams still smell like Iowa’s film incentive program that resulted in several felony corruption convictions? Profit, earned through willing transactions between people free to walk away, has no victim except through fraud. Government has no such restraint with dollars confiscated through taxation.

Another thing, having traveled around this country before settling in Iowa, I see it as sinful to cover Iowa soil with “hot boxes” when there is plenty of unproductive soil to build on elsewhere.

For those who feel the need to hate success, there is the fact that some single mom in Waukee is donating to the richest company in America and probably doesn’t even know it.

I can’t see any benefit to anyone in this except for a politician needing a rose pinned on their nose. Might there be something we are missing?

2 responses to “The Richest Company in America. But Not Rich Enough.

  1. We don’t always agree, Fritz, but this is one thing we definitely see eye-to-eye on. Even as much as I’d like the Midwest to become “Silicon Prairie” (which, given my chosen profession, is self-serving, but I’m honest about it), handing out tax breaks to companies just to get them here is beyond ridiculous. Other tech has come here for really obvious reasons — an educated, hardworking workforce, cheap energy, low cost of living and buildings, etc. Why sweeten an already sweet pot? Oh, yeah, because it gives politicians a reason to act like they had something to do with economic forces already in progress.

    The argument of, “Well, if they come here, then more will come, and BOOM!” I can tell you right now, Des Moines is already a huge technology center — the insurance industries started it all and now the number of technology companies in that area has grown exponentially. I can get a job in about 2.3 seconds in the DSM/Ames/CR/CF/Wloo areas because of the number of technology companies around there looking for solid talent. It’s not a matter of needing to lure tech to Iowa — it’s a matter of luring GOOD tech to Iowa that will further expand our already impressive sector.

    • Meant to say hi when I saw you at the whinery but was occupido in a firey discussion of some sort.

      I’ve thought for a long time that the tech sector would grow in Iowa, even in small towns as people seek to escape pavement, crowds and crime. Being one of those escapees myself, I wonder why it hasn’t happened faster. With the cash on hand that Apple has $208 million is a drop in the bucket. The continuing precedent is the problem. $208 is even small potatoes to Iowans.

      We took a short walk up the road tonight to see if there were any northern Lights but none. The walk was worth it, though. Utterly peaceful. Let’s hope we aren’t inundated any time soon. When I lived in the mountains in Montana I thought of national parks as magnets for RVs and tourists so our area remained … as it was.

      On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 7:52 AM, alternativebyfritz wrote:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s